By treating the inflammatory symptoms of depression — rather than the neurological ones — researchers and doctors are opening up an exciting new dimension in the fight against what has become a global epidemic.  Caroline Williams of The Guardian writes: “The good news is that the few clinical trials done so far have found that adding anti-inflammatory medicines to antidepressants not only improves symptoms, it also increases the proportion of people who respond to treatment, although more trials will be needed to confirm this.

 folk try to pin down the vaccine-autism link to one man in particular, Wakefield who published a study in 1998 about such possible link.Now, let’s take a look at another source “wikipedia”, and let’s see what they also state about the vaccination court and when it was established.

Vaccine court is the popular term which refers to the Office of Special Masters of the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, which administers a no-fault system for litigating vaccine injury claims. These claims against vaccine manufacturers cannot normally be filed in state or federal civil courts, but instead must be heard in the Court of Claims, sitting without a jury. The program was established by the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA), passed by the United States Congress in response to a threat to the vaccine supply due to a 1980s scare over the DPT vaccine. Despite the belief of most public health officials that claims of side effects were unfounded, large jury awards had been given to some plaintiffs, most DPT vaccine makers had ceased production, and officials feared the loss of herd immunity.[1]
…

en.wikipedia.org…

Wikipedia does state that the Vaccine Court was established in 1986. That’s 12 years before Wakefield’s study. What Wikipedia and the NLBS folk fail to tell you is that Wakefield is not one of the originators of the link between vaccines, neurological disorders like autism and other health related problems. Neither was Wakefield an originator of the “vaccine autism movement” as it has been dubbed. They don’t tell you either that parents and doctors have been reporting adverse effects, including neurological disorders, in children after vaccination for many decades before Wakefield published his study.

So the question is, how is Wakefield “one of the originators of the vaccine-autism controversy” when his study was done decades after many reports were made of adverse effects from vaccines, including neurological disorders such as autism?

We actually have to go back several decades to find when the link was first made.

Let’s take a look at an earlier study which found cases in which some children developed acute cerebral symptoms within a period of hours after the administration of pertussis vaccine.

Original Article

ENCEPHALOPATHIES FOLLOWING PROPHYLACTIC PERTUSSIS VACCINE

RANDOLPH K. BYERS,
FREDERIC C. MOLL

– Author Affiliations

The Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School and from the Infants’ and Children’s Hospitals, Boston, Mass.

Abstract

Inspection of the records of the Children’s Hospital for the past ten years has disclosed 15 instances in which children developed acute cerebral symptoms within a period of hours after the administration of pertussis vaccine. The children varied between 5 and 18 months in age and, in so far as it is possible to judge children of this age range, were developing normally according to histories supplied by their parents. None had had convulsions previously. Many different lots of vaccine, made by eight different manufacturers over a period of eight years, were implicated. The inoculations were given throughout the usual geographic range of children coming to this hospital. All but one, at the time of follow-up or death, showed evidence of impairment of the nervous system, which might still have been in the healing stage in three or four.

During the same period about half as many children were seen in the hospital suffering from the encephalopathy secondary to smallpox vaccination, and about twice as many from the encephalopathy complicating pertussis itself.

A variety of etiologic considerations were suggested by consideration of the reported cases and references to the literature. That constitutional factors may have been involved was suggested by both the preponderance of males as opposed to females, and by the high incidence of abnormalities of the nervous system in the family histories. The clinical course and cytologic abnormalities of spinal fluids found in acute cases indicated an encephalopathy. The literature suggested that this process might have resulted from either the activity of a specific toxin or from an antigen-antibody response. Against the former of these hypotheses was the unstable nature of the heretofore recognized toxins which could hardly survive in properly aged vaccines. The rapid onset of symptoms, occasionally within minutes of the first injection, seemed strong evidence against the second. The present study has left these etiologic considerations unanswered, but it has called attention to a risk of the prophylactic use of pertussis vaccine not hitherto recognized.

In view of the impressive evidence of the effectiveness of prophylactic pertussis vaccine now accumulating, it seems likely that babies are safer vaccinated than not. Further studies should be made to prove this point definitely, for the encephalopathy following pertussis vaccine seems more devastating than the vast majority of the nervous lesions following the use of smallpox vaccine.

Received October 27, 1947.

Copyright © 1948 by the American Academy of Pediatrics

pediatrics.aappublications.org…

Apologies for having to post the entire abstract, but I did so to avoid any claims of “cherry-picked” data and/or that I left out information.

So the Vaccine Court was in fact established because other researchers, not Wakefield, found a link between the DPT shot and encephalopathy, including autism, not to mention that for many decades before Wakefield’s research, parents and doctors have been also reporting adverse effects after vaccination.

As you can see from the abstract above the link between vaccines and autism is far older than the research that Wakefield published. So, why is it that the NLBS folk claim that Wakenfield is one of the main originators of the “anti-vaccine movement”? When parents, and doctors have been reporting adverse symptoms and health problems, including neurological disorders such as autism for decades before he even published his study?

The answer is simple. Wakefield has been made into a scapegoat, an excuse to dismiss the “vaccine controversy”, and the NLBS people of ATS fell for it.

CDC lies by omission…

SV 40

We’re told Fukushima is safe, but each day 400 to 1000 tons of radiated water are dumped into the Pacific.

This doesn’t have an effect?

LOTS of Links about Vaccine Safety…

Administration of Thimerosal to Infant Rats Increases Overflow of Glutamate and Aspartate in the Prefrontal Cortex: Protective Role of Dehydroepiandrosterone SulfateVaccines and Autism

Thimerosal neurotoxicity is associated with glutathione depletion: protection with glutathione precursors.

Administration of Thimerosal to Infant Rats Increases Overflow of Glutamate and Aspartate in the Prefrontal Cortex: Protective Role of Dehydroepiandrosterone Sulfate

A positive association found between autism prevalence and childhood vaccination uptake across the U.S. population.

Do aluminum vaccine adjuvants contribute to the rising prevalence of autism?

How aluminum adjuvants could promote and enhance non-target IgE synthesis in a genetically-vulnerable sub-population.

Hepatitis B vaccination of male neonates and autism diagnosis, NHIS 1997-2002.

Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and blood mercury level: a case-control study in Chinese children.

False Flag Attacks…

9/11

7/7

Boston Marathon

Always the drills as cover stories

ISIS the new drum beat to war

Aliens/UFOs

—  the intentional misleading by governments

—  there’s no denying that there’s something going on

Alien interaction with us…

 Former World Bank Senior Council, Karen Hudes has been making a lot of noise lately, and she recently said something she’s never said before. She said that a second species on Earth controls money and religion. Many people who have held positions to know things that the rest of us might not know have made some very shocking statements lately. For example, Paul Hellyer, former Canadian Minister of National Defence recently said that there are at least “4 known alien species that have been visiting Earth

Karen Hudes studied law at Yale Law School and economics at the University of Amsterdam. She worked in the US Export Import Bank of the US from 1980-1985 and in the Legal Department of the World Bank from 1986-2007. She established the Non Governmental Organization Committee of the International Law Section of the American Bar Association and the Committee on Multilateralism and the Accountability of International Organizations of the American Branch of the International Law Association.

 Lies by omission

We’re constantly lied to about the origins of us…

Constantly lied to about Marijuana…

Laws… politics… what it means to be a citizen in the USA…

Media lies and biases, spreading abject lies if not misinformation with impunity.

Global Warming…